Legal Blog

The exemption was designed to streamline defense cooperation by reducing licensing requirements for eligible transfers between approved parties in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Instead of requiring traditional ITAR licenses for many transactions, qualifying activities may proceed under an exemption framework, provided strict conditions are met.

Join us on Wednesday, May 27th at 4:00 PM ET for an informative session on how foreign investment deals can be impacted by CFIUS review, covering key risks and requirements. Spots are limited, so register today.

Foreign investment can open doors, but it can also trigger serious legal review. In this video, Brandon explains what the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) is and the top three (3) legal issues U.S. companies need to understand before moving forward. Learn what triggers CFIUS jurisdiction, the significance of mandatory filings, and the mitigation measures that may follow. Each step plays a role in your deal's success.

Join us on June 16 & 17, 2026, from 9:00am to 1:00pm EDT, for an export compliance webinar featuring our Managing Attorney, Deanna Clark, Esq. and other experts from the U.S. Census Bureau (CENSUS) and the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). The speakers will provide training on export filing requirements.

Join us on Tuesday, May 12, 2026, at 6:00 PM ET for an informative webinar on legal guidance for U.S. Counsel in Cross-Border Compliance. This 1-hour webinar equips U.S. lawyers with practical strategies for advising clients on cross-border regulatory compliance in highly regulated industries.

In this video, we provide a step-by-step guide to claiming International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) customs duty refunds using the Customs Automated Processing Environment (CAPE) in CBP's Automated Commercial Environment (ACE).

Join us on Wednesday, May 27th at 4:00 PM ET for an informative session on how foreign investment deals can be impacted by CFIUS review, covering key risks and requirements. Spots are limited, so register today.

If your company is bringing on a foreign investor, selling a stake in the business to a foreign company, or considering a foreign acquisition, the transaction may trigger a CFIUS filing, even if a national security issue does not seem obvious at first glance. Below are the top three legal issues U.S. companies should understand when evaluating foreign investment or acquisition opportunities.

In need of assistance? Schedule an intake meeting with our office. With the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), and subsequent directives from the Court of International Trade (CIT) addressing liquidation and re-liquidation of affected entries, importers are now evaluating how best to preserve their rights to obtain refunds of previously paid IEEPA duties. In this evolving environment, filing

CBP seized over 5,000 peptide shipments in a recent enforcement action involving misdeclared, consolidated imports. The case underscores how documentation and labeling issues can trigger seizures for regulated goods overseen by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Importers remain responsible for compliance, but we help evaluate seizures, respond to CBP, and develop strategies to resolve issues and reduce future risk.

By publishing in B2B Wholesaler Magazine, our firm aims to break down complex regulatory and business issues into clear, actionable insights that help industry participants stay informed, compliant, and ahead of emerging trends.

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Learning Resources v. Trump, which held that the President was not authorized to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the White House responded by imposing a surcharge on most imports under a different statutory authority, Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.

In this video, we discuss the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Learning Resources v. Trump, which held that the President was not authorized to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). As a result of the decision, certain tariffs imposed under multiple executive orders ceased to be collected as of February 24, 2026.

In this video, we discuss how importers can handle potential duty refunds related to IEEPA tariffs following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in "Learning Resources v. Trump." Because the Court held that the President was not authorized to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), some importers may be entitled to tariff refunds and may need to take proactive steps to preserve their rights.

In this video, we provide an update on the developments following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Learning Resources v. Trump regarding tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). After the Court held that the President was not authorized to impose tariffs under IEEPA, the case was remanded to the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT), which has directed that certain entries be liquidated or re-liquidated without those duties.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has announced the launch of its updated e-Allegations website, providing enhanced guidance for submitting anonymous reports of suspected trade violations. The e-Allegations Program allows members of the trade community and the public to report potential violations of U.S. trade laws directly to CBP.

The Court held that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs, rejecting the Administration’s use of emergency powers to support broad tariff measures imposed by the President. The ruling has immediate and long-term implications for importers, exporters, and companies managing global supply chains.

At its February 10, 2026 ENDS PMTA roundtable, FDA stressed that complete product data, strong manufacturing controls, and solid scientific evidence, especially for flavored products, are critical for authorization. While the agency offered more transparency about how it evaluates applications, it declined to set clear numerical benchmarks, leaving manufacturers still seeking greater predictability.

Importers should consider reviewing the updated Dashboard as part of their broader UFLPA compliance efforts. Our firm can advise clients on UFLPA compliance, supply chain risk assessments, responding to CBP detentions, and preparing submissions to rebut the UFLPA presumption. If you have questions about how these updates may affect your imports or would like assistance navigating a UFLPA enforcement action, we are available to help.

Companies doing business in Venezuela or other high-risk jurisdictions like Syria, Sudan, or Cuba, often face uncertainty about how export controls and sanctions apply to their products, technology, and transactions. Let us handle the regulatory complexity so you can stay focused on running your business.